S. Lamens
To Win
E. Raducanu
To Win
Suzan Lamens vs Eudice Wong Chong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W W L
Form
W L W L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Lamens 1 - 1 Chong
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Chong winning 3. The last match between Lamens and Chong was at the W50 Roehampton, 13-02-2024, First, I.hard with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 1 |
| Eudice Wong Chong | 1 |
W50 Roehampton(13-02-2024)
6
3
2
6
6
1
| Lamens | Stats | Chong |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (15-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (7-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 73 | Ranking | 374 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 213 |
| 25 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 58% (300-217) | Career Total W/L | 57% (235-177) |
| $426,753 | Career Prize Money | $5,565 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 21 | Games Won | 22 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:58:30 | Average Match Time | 1:58:30 |
| 60% (91/151) | 1st Serve % | 66% (102/155) |
| 65% (59/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (52/102) |
| 35% (21/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (27/53) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 61% (11/18) |
| 49% (76/155) | Return Points Win % | 47% (71/151) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Eudice Wong Chong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Hiromi Abe
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Hephzibah Oluwadare
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
98)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
10%
(
1 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Ciara Moore
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Alyssa Reguer
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Jorge
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Nadiya Kolb
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Yuki Naito
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (300/217) | Win/Loss | 57% (235/177) |
| 56% (664/519) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (537/430) |
| 53% (5707/5059) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4634/4303) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (200/143) |
| 61% (187/120) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (19/20) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 843 | Aces Total | 325 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2440 | Total Double Faults | 1061 |
| 1:29:12 | Average Match Time | 1:31:1 |
| 429.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.1 |
| 59% (18217/30941) | 1st Serve % | 66% (15763/23958) |
| 62% (11247/18170) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9436/15763) |
| 43% (5458/12796) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3716/8195) |
| 51% (2097/4127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1556/3209) |
| 48% (14931/31092) | Return Points Win % | 47% (11686/24746) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 54% (27/23) | Main Tour W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 58% (164/117) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 58% (67/49) |
| 58% (297/513) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (231/405) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (48/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (50/80) |
| 56% (85/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (76/144) |
| 91% (274/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (223/187) |
| 9% (274/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (223/36) |
| 21% (243/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (189/48) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
